For example, it is claimed that a detractor from the Christian world-view should not hop into the Christian system of thought by erecting an objection grounded in the Bible and then demand an answer be given without the use of a Bible.
Others say that
It's a blatant attempt to limit the skeptic's use the bible as evidence of how stupid the bible is.
or that it is an example of reductio ad absurdum.
I have to side with the others so you will not find it in my "Delusional Logic". I find it somewhat obtuse for people to try to avoid being questioned about the bible like this. (I think William lane Craig uses it more often than he has hot dinners.)
Any explanation of the bible that uses the bible as its premise is circular and pointless.