They like to teach the controversy and claim that the arguments of 'neo-darwinists' don't hold up to scrutiny.
Well does that matter or not? ID's proponents claim that it is a science but does that hold up to scrutiny? They claim that they start from the data. That's nice, but science starts from the hypothesis and uses data from the real world to see whether it supports the science - not the other way round.
And although they deny it, Intelligent Design requires an Intelligent Designer, and we are being impolite if we ask Christians who that designer might have been.
So let's start from the data again - and ask what data shows that God (obviously the pseudonymous intelligent being who designed everything) exists. Is there any data? I doubt it. After all, faith is more powerful than data.
Then we can move on to the real science again.