However, having admitted that she might have been right about a few things, I noticed some people telling me that they were appalled by the way that she is being pilloried by press and people alike. It was gently pointed out to me that Margaret Thatcher has a family, and that people are not being respectful to them.
But didn't she once say of her son Mark "Mark could sell snow to the Eskimos and sand to the Arabs"? Of course she neglected to mention his ability to sell arms to the Saudis (of which, naturally, he was innocent anyway) or his inability to find his way through sand while pretending to be a rally driver. The latter resulted in a large bill for the British tax payer and the former to considerable embarrassment and frustration for the same people (even though it didn't officially happen). And to make up for it he now has the title 'Sir Mark', thanks to the beneficence of his parents.
Even his twin sister, Carol Thatcher, publicly disapproved of Sir Mark and she aspired to make her own way in the world as a journalist - an honourable profession if ever there was one! This is a woman who referred to the tennis player Jo-Wilfried Tsonga as a 'golliwog'. What a nice lady.
I'm sure Mrs Thatcher has some perfectly pleasant relatives as well, but her children don't get much sympathy from me.
So while I felt a measure of disinterest for protests against a state funeral and for the rise of a song about the death of a witch in the charts this week, that one comment about her family might have made me feel more radical than I did before.
But who cares about a bill of over 10 million pounds for a funeral when living, breathing, public servants are being treated so well (!!) by their employer!
Can the UK government afford niceties like this? If so, why can't it care for its employees properly?
Being fair to the Thatchers would include provision of a nice prison cell and the withdrawal of a title and the burial of a cardboard coffin in a privatised municipal dump!