micro evolution exists macro evolution not so as different species can not mate to produce new spices such as Ligons(lion and tigers)which are already from a closely realated species) it is very hard for them to reproduce but when they have they are sterile and cannot reprduce and create a new species if macro evolution is correct there would be new species being constantly created but it is the exact opposite slowly more and more spiecs are being extint & lowering in numbers.
evolution leads to death. do u not think that there is more to our existance than that?
As for the homolgous structures that just shows that thier are similarites between species which for he show that they have been created by the same creater, you see this in the was electrons revolve around in atoms and teh way the world revolves around the sun.
with stratography and rock layers they date them by using circular reasoning: the rocks are dated by the fossil layers in the rock and the fossils are dated by the rock layers and they do find fossil in "incorrect layers" they have also found human hand and footprints in these layers. they are also tree remains that stand upright that go through these "billions" of years old rock layers which fill in for noahs flood as when you have different types of dirt in a jar with water and you shake it it settles down in layers.
A for dating methods scientists have dated new objects and have been given absolutley reductious dates and did you know it doesnt take hundreds of years for objects to become pertriefied sneakers have been pertrified as well as a buch of other objects.
just think a couple of hundred years ago australia was not even discoverd and this back a nother couple of hundred and another humas history does not really go back very far at all.
Thats just some food for thought. I recomend that you do some research on the other side of the argument aswell :)
and are you going to deny my uncle being healed of cancer when he was 60 on his death bead looking as pale and sickly riddled with tumours all through his body. We all prayed for him and God healed him and he passed the tumours and now he looks heathy as anything and doctors are amazed at his medical records. can evolution explain that.
My un-named critic has actually suggested that I should do some reading about the 'other side of the argument', as if it actually appears that I have not done that already. Its not worth refuting the creationist babble that they have accepted uncritically, asking them when Australia was discovered, nor pointing out in more detail that they haven't understood the difference between petrification (which is worthy of another post soon) and fossilisation.
As for the fortunate uncle, how could I possibly deny that he has been healed? Spontaneous remissions occur about 1 time in 10,000 cases, and this must have been one of them. I won't try to explain it with evolution, nor do I need to, but I certainly wouldn't explain it with prayer either.
By coincidence or not, another post soon after the above pointed to this image.
Interestingly one of the examples used in that parody of evolution, Nebraska Man, was more of a creationist hoax. Read about it on Rosa Rubicondior's blog.