micro evolution exists macro evolution not so as different species can not mate to produce new spices such as Ligons(lion and tigers)which are already from a closely realated species) it is very hard for them to reproduce but when they have they are sterile and cannot reprduce and create a new species if macro evolution is correct there would be new species being constantly created but it is the exact opposite slowly more and more spiecs are being extint & lowering in numbers.
evolution leads to death. do u not think that there is more to our existance than that?
As for the homolgous structures that just shows that thier are similarites between species which for he show that they have been created by the same creater, you see this in the was electrons revolve around in atoms and teh way the world revolves around the sun.
with stratography and rock layers they date them by using circular reasoning: the rocks are dated by the fossil layers in the rock and the fossils are dated by the rock layers and they do find fossil in "incorrect layers" they have also found human hand and footprints in these layers. they are also tree remains that stand upright that go through these "billions" of years old rock layers which fill in for noahs flood as when you have different types of dirt in a jar with water and you shake it it settles down in layers.
A for dating methods scientists have dated new objects and have been given absolutley reductious dates and did you know it doesnt take hundreds of years for objects to become pertriefied sneakers have been pertrified as well as a buch of other objects.
just think a couple of hundred years ago australia was not even discoverd and this back a nother couple of hundred and another humas history does not really go back very far at all.
Thats just some food for thought. I recomend that you do some research on the other side of the argument aswell :)
and are you going to deny my uncle being healed of cancer when he was 60 on his death bead looking as pale and sickly riddled with tumours all through his body. We all prayed for him and God healed him and he passed the tumours and now he looks heathy as anything and doctors are amazed at his medical records. can evolution explain that.
My un-named critic has actually suggested that I should do some reading about the 'other side of the argument', as if it actually appears that I have not done that already. Its not worth refuting the creationist babble that they have accepted uncritically, asking them when Australia was discovered, nor pointing out in more detail that they haven't understood the difference between petrification (which is worthy of another post soon) and fossilisation.
As for the fortunate uncle, how could I possibly deny that he has been healed? Spontaneous remissions occur about 1 time in 10,000 cases, and this must have been one of them. I won't try to explain it with evolution, nor do I need to, but I certainly wouldn't explain it with prayer either.
By coincidence or not, another post soon after the above pointed to this image.
Interestingly one of the examples used in that parody of evolution, Nebraska Man, was more of a creationist hoax. Read about it on Rosa Rubicondior's blog.
5 comments:
An example of how creation 'scientists' deliberately mislead their credulous and gullible market for money.
I wonder how the fact that Australia was discovered, not by European, but by Australians at least 40,000 years ago, fits in with a 6000 year-old earth notion? Probably just another fact to be consigned to the 'misleading' bin because it leads away from the desired conclusion.
Thanks for the mention, BTW.
That is funny, whether intentional or otherwise. Very funny.
I for one am glad species can't mate to produce spices.
"We all prayed for him and God healed him and he passed the tumours and now he looks heathy as anything and doctors are amazed at his medical records. can evolution explain that."
I put some water in the freezer and it turned into ice. Can evolution explain that?
I threw my copy of Existentialism For Dummies into the air and it fell back to earth. Can evolution explain that?
I accidentally called one of my cats by one of my other cats' names. Can evolution explain that?
I recomend that you do some research on the other side of the argument aswell :)
Also I like your blog.
Aswell.
I am shocked and appalled that no one has criticised the comparison of electrons around the nucleus with the earths rotation around the sun, and how it clearly stems from the model description and not the really weird way small particles act.
Post a Comment