Richard Dawkins sometimes seems to rejoice in the way that his critics refer to him as 'strident'. Shortly before the death of Christopher Hitchins, Dawkins interviewed his fellow 'horseman of the apocalypse'.
He told Dawkins in the interview:
“You have a discipline in which you are very distinguished. You've educated a lot of people; nobody denies that, not even your worst enemies. You see your discipline being attacked and defamed and attempts made to drive it out.
“Stridency is the least you should muster . . . It's the shame of your colleagues that they don't form ranks and say, ‘Listen, we're going to defend our colleagues from these appalling and obfuscating elements.’”
Well said - of course!
One small thing that I can claim is that I frequently defend Dawkins against the way that he is mis-represented. Religious family members might not like him, but they can't, in all honesty, use stridency as an excuse.
You can read more at this link.
No comments:
Post a Comment