My friend and colleague, The Erratic Photographer, posted an item on his blog a few weeks ago about erosion of freedom in this country. (UK by the way!) Being a talented photographer, his article was called The War on Photography. (I reccomend that you follow the link and read it.)
Maybe things are more general than that. I agree with everything he said, but I also feel even more strongly. The laws that have been implemented to combat terrorism in recent years are gradually and stealthily eroding our freedoms. In this sense terrorism is winning the war against freedom. Now I am not defending terrorists. Regular readers will know that. I also don't discriminate between the islamic kind and the normal 'cuddly' christian or separatist kinds. But . . .
Imagine that you are an innocent person (which shouldn't be too difficult, being the honest decent person that you are) and that somehow by some coincidence you become a suspect in an anti-terrorist investigation. You could find yourself arrested and falsely imprisoned for weeks without even being charged. Your house would be ransacked by policemen and your computer taken away for forensic examination. Many people who's houses are burgled feel that their property has somehow been defiled, but would it be an less defiled because the action was taken by the police? I think not!
You would probably lose your job and many of your friends (who might be wary of guilt by association).
So far as far as I am aware, not a single suspect kept in custody for as long as the law permits has been prosecuted.
Even medieval laws are not perfect, but in this sense they seem more just than 21st century legislation.
It's an interesting one indeed and a point I fully agree with you and Erratic Photographer.
ReplyDeleteIt's scary to think that because you choose to photograph a particular building because it's iconic or pretty or you felt like it an upset policeman may try to get your camera without any justification just quoting a single law... and they can't, actually, take your camera on those grounds. But who knows that?